top of page

Are Leaders Born or Made?

  • Richard Nugent
  • 6 days ago
  • 2 min read

During more than twenty years of developing leaders, I've been asked this more times than I can count.


Are leaders born or made?


My answer is always the same. It's the wrong question. Nobody can answer it unequivocally anyway.


Here's what we do know. The brain has plasticity. It changes, adapts and grows in response to environment and experience. Even our DNA responds to context in ways that would have seemed extraordinary to scientists a generation ago. The boundaries between nature and nurture aren't clean. They never have been. And anyone who tells you otherwise is oversimplifying something gloriously complex.


So if that's the wrong question, what's the right one?


Are you doing everything you can to develop the people in your organisation who genuinely want to lead?

The real differentiator isn't background, education or raw talent. It's hunger. People with a genuine thirst to lead find a way, one way or another. They seek out opportunities to lead at whatever level they're at. They learn about leadership informally, through observation, through relationships, through trial and error. When formal development becomes available, they don't just take it. They grab it with both hands and are genuinely grateful for it.


You can't manufacture that hunger. But you can create the conditions where it flourishes. You can make sure you're not accidentally extinguishing it through neglect, poor management or a lack of opportunity.


But here's the question most leadership development conversations never ask. What about the people who don't want to lead?


Your highest performing subject matter experts, your most critical technical specialists, the people whose expertise is irreplaceable. Not everyone in that category wants a leadership role. And that's not a failure. That's a reality most organisations handle badly.


Pushing brilliant people toward leadership they don't want does damage in both directions. It puts the wrong person in a leadership role, and it removes a brilliant expert from the place where they add most value.


The answer isn't to ignore them. It's stretch within their current role. Additional responsibilities that keep them growing without pushing them into leadership, and an open, honest dialogue about what they actually want from their career and how the organisation can support that.


So here are the two questions worth asking yourself.


Do you know which of your people have the hunger to lead? And are you giving them every opportunity to develop it?


And do you know which of your people don't want to lead? And are you keeping them engaged, valued and growing anyway?


Both matter. And most organisations are only having half the conversation.

 
 
bottom of page